Learning Goal: I’m working on a philosophy case study and need a sample draft to
Learning Goal: I'm working on a philosophy case study and need a sample draft to help me learn.The purpose of this assignment is for students to apply the course concepts and tounderstand the benefits of leisure and participation in a variety of leisure opportunities.Students will demonstrate synthesis of correlating leisure involvement to overall personalhealth and wellness. Students will write an in-depth analysis of a personal leisureexperience they engage in during the semester. The format will be through a writtennarrative. The In Depth Leisure Analysis should consist of 3 sections: activitydescription, a personal analysis and a conceptual analysis. As a component of the classstudents will be encouraged and expected to engage in a variety of leisure activitiesthroughout the semester. Students will need to choose one of these activities to writeabout at some point during the semester. The In Depth Leisure Analysis will be submittedin the Assignment section in Canvas. During the semester it is anticipated that studentswill engage in at least 1 leisure activity per week, which they can choose to write about,but students are only required to write about 1 activity. Following is a brief outline ofpotential content. Students should not directly answer the suggested questions in theirwriting, but use only for a reference.Activity Descriptions:This first section of the assignment should be a description of the chosen leisure experience which students will participate in during the semester (1-2 paragraphs), and should address some of the following questions: What was the experience? Who participated? Where was the activity conducted? When did it take place? Was there a financial cost to the experience? Did the activity require equipment or resources that you had or had to obtain? What took place during the activity? (Offer a detailed description)Personal Analysis:The second section of the written paper should be a 2-3 paragraph personal analysis of the experience. Below is a listing of questions for students to consider in their personal reflection and analysis. Demonstrate a thoughtful reflection of the experience. Why did I choose this activity? What benefits did I receive through my participation? Was there an intrinsic or extrinsic reward to the experience? What emotions did I experience before, during and after the activity? Did I have the appropriate skill level for this activity? Did my skill level help or hinder the experience? Did I experience what I intended to during the activity? Will I choose this activity again? (why/why not?)Will this activity be a lifelong pursuit for me? Will I continue the pursuit later in life with adaptations that may be included? Will the value of this activity change for me with the adaptations?Conceptual Analysis:The final section of the assignment should be a 2-3 paragraph analysis of the experience as it relates to the core concepts discussed in the course (ie. leisure as a condition of being, leisure behavior and healthy living, leisure and life span, culture and leisure, issues and trends in leisure, etc.) Students will need to demonstrate integration of course content through 1-2 citations in this section of the paper. How has this experience changed your perception of leisure from the start of class to now? How has the experience helped you to synthesis the importance of leisure as acomponent of human behavior? Various definitions of leisure were discussed in class and in the online discussions. Apply 1 (or more) of the definitions to the experience and explain. How does this experience relate to life satisfaction and well-being? Issues and current trends in recreation are discussed in the readings and lectures. Does your experience support any of the content discussed? Explain. What course concepts does my participation in this activity relate to? Leisure and people with disabilities (PWD) was one of the course lectures. Can you visualize PWD participating in the activity you selected? Separately? Inclusively?RubricIn-Depth Leisure Analysis (3)In-Depth Leisure Analysis (3)CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePrimary Quality10 ptsProficientAddresses all 3 elements of the prompt. Is of sufficient length (3-4 paragraphs) and clearly states the authors opinion.5 ptsAdequateMisses 1 of the elements of the prompt. Displays vague or superficial understanding of the topic. Length is 2-3 paragraphs.0 ptsSubstandardMisses 2 or more elements of the prompt. Displays little to no understanding of the topic. Length is only 1 paragraph.10 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTimeliness of Activity Participation10 ptsProficientParticipates in Activity during current semester5 ptsAdequateParticipates in activity during time in college0 ptsSubstandardParticipates in activity previous to college10 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeActivity Description10 ptsProficientThorough description of activity participated in. Addresses a minimum of 5 elements identified in syllabus.5 ptsAdequateModerate description of activity participated in. Addresses 2-5 elements identified in syllabus.0 ptsSubstandardMinimal/no description of activity participated in. Does not address elements identified in syllabus.10 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSubmission Timeliness10 ptsProficientSubmitted by 11:59 of specified due date0 ptsSubstandardNo submission10 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePersonal Analysis10 ptsProficientProvides a personal reflection of their involvement in activity. Addresses a minimum of 3 elements identified in syllabus.5 ptsAdequateProvides a personal reflection of their involvement in activity. Addresses 1 element identified in syllabus.0 ptsSubstandardMinimal/no personal reflection of their involvement in activity. Does not address elements identified in syllabus.10 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConceptual Analysis10 ptsProficientNoticeable relationship to leisure content and class material evidenced by direct quotation or course-based reference. More than 2 references made.5 ptsAdequateSome relationship to leisure content and class material evidenced by direct quotation or course-based reference. 1-2 references made.0 ptsSubstandardNo relationship to leisure content or class material evidenced by a direct quotation or course-based reference. No references made.10 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuality of Written Content10 ptsProficientWritten content is free of grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors.0 ptsAdequateWritten content has fewer than five (5) grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors.0 ptsSubstandardWritten content contains more than five (5) grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors.10 ptsTotal Points: 70 Requirements: answer   |   .doc file

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.